Types of Speech Acts in the Apostrophe Device based on John Searle's Theory; a Case Study of Āyāt al-ʾAḥkām in the Holy Quran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Morteza Sadeghinezhad ¹
• fereshteh Afzali ²

¹ MA Graduate, Department of Arabic Language Translation, Faculty of Humanities, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Department of Arabic Translation, Faculty of Humanities, Damghan National University, Iran.

10.22067/jquran.2024.80903.1466

Abstract

"Apostrophe" (Iltifāt) means grammatical altering between the use of first, second, and third person in a sentence or consecutive sentences. It aims at examining the coherence in the Holy Quran. Speech act theory is one of the important topics in pragmatics. It conveys that a conversation includes many acts such as description, declaration, command, prohibition, prayer, wish, etc. Considering a text as an act enables religious texts experts to change the nature of the texts more systematically. John Searle is one of the theorists of this area. He has classified speech acts into representatives, directives, commissives, expressive, and declarations. In this study, based on his theory, as a linguistic discourse analysis, and by using a descriptive-analytical method, the text and context of Iltifāt verses in the Holy Quran have been examined, and the type of their acts were identified. According to the results, regarding Searle's five speech acts, in these verses, the representative and commissive acts have been used more and less than other types, respectively. Also, the verbs used in each of these speech acts are as follows: describing, emphasizing, reporting, criticizing, and granting in the representative act, offering, making a condition, asking for explanation, protestingly asking, etc. in the directive act, giving and making a pledge, and swearing in the commissive act, praising, thanking, threatening, wishing, etc. in the expressive act, and terminating and judging in the declaration act.

Keywords

• Quran
• Iltifāt verses
• Discourse analysis
• Speech act
• Searle

Main Subjects

• Quran and Hadith Studies

---

References

ʻAbd al-Ḥalīm, Muḥammad A.S. “Kārburd-hā va Kārkird-hā-yi Shigird Iltifāt dar Qurān”. Pazhūhish-hā-yi Qurānī. translated by Abū al-Fażl Ḥurī, yr. 18, no. 2(2013/1391): 54-81.

ʻAbd Allāhī, Muḥammad ʻAlī . “Naẓarīyih-yi Afʻāl Guftārī”. Faṣlnāmih-yi ʻIlmī Pazhūhishī University of Qom. Yr. 6, no. 4 (2006/1384): 91-119.

Abū ʿUbaydah. Muʿamar ibn Muthanā. Majāz al-Qurān. researched by Muḥammad Fuād Sizgīn. Cairo: Maktab al-Khānjī, 2002/1381.

Āqā Gulzādih, Firdūs. Taḥlīl-i Guftimān-i Intiqādī. Tehran: Intishārāt-i ʻIlmī va Farhangī, 1996/1375; 2006/1385.

Dihkhudā, ʻAlī Akbar. Farhang Dihkhudā. Tehran: University of Tehran, 1999/1377.

Fairclough, Norman. Taḥlīl-i Intiqādī Guftimān. researched by Fāṭimah Shāystih Sīrān et al. Tehran: Markaz  Muṭāliʿāt  va Taḥqīqāt Risānih-hā, 2001/1379

Fāʾiz, Qāsim. ʿUlūm al-Balāgha maʻa Tamārīn Qurānīya. Tehran: Samt,  2010/1388.

Farāhīdī, Khalīl ibn Aḥmad. Kitāb al-ʻAyn. researched by Maḥdī Makhzūmī va Ibrāḥīm  Sāmarrāī. Qum: Hijrat, Chāp-i Duwum, 1990/1410.

Grayling, A. C. Nigarish-hā-yi Nūvīn dar Falsafih. researched by Yūsuf Dānishvar et al. Qum:  Mūʾassisah-yi Farhangī Ṭāhā, 2002/1380.

Ḥurī, Abū al-Fażl. “Barrisī Shigird Qurānī Iltifāt dar Partū Sākhtār Iṭilāʻāt Guftimān”. Pazhūhish-hā-yi Zabān va Adabīyāt-i Taṭbīqī. No. 4 (2011/1390): 17-39.

Ibn ʻĀshūr, Muḥammad Ṭāḥir. Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Tūnis: Dār al-Tūnisīya, 1984/1404.

Ibn Athīr, Naṣr Allāh ibn Muḥammad. al-Mathal al-Sāʾir fī Adab al-Kātib wa al-Shāʻir. s.l. s.n. s.d.

Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn Mukarram. Lisān al-ʿArab. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. 1993/1414.

Ibn Muʻtazz, ʻAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad. al-Badīʻ fī al- Badīʻ. S.l. Dār al-Jīl, Chāp-i Awwal,  1990/1410.

Kawāz, Muḥammad Karīm. Sabkshināsī Iʻjāz Balāghī Qurān. researched by Sayyid Ḥusayn  Siydī. Tehran: Sūkhan, 2008/1386.

Qurān-i Karīm. translated by Ḥusayn Anṣārīyān. Tehran:  Sāzimān-i Dār al-Qurān-i Karīm, Nashr Tilāvat, 2014/1393

Raḥmānī, Humā, ʻAbd Allāh Rādmard. “Bāznigarī Maʿnāyī dar Iltifāt Balāghī va Aqsām va Kārkird-hā-yi ān”. Justār-hā-yi Adabī. no. 176 (2012/1391): 143-168.

Ṣafavī, Kūrush. Maʻnāshināsī Kārburdī. Tehran: Hamshahrī, 2004/1382.

Sakkākī, Yūsuf ibn Abī Bakr. Miftāḥ al-ʻUlūm. researched by ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd Hindāwī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyya. Chāp-i Awwal, 1937/1356.

Searle, John R. Afʻāl Guftārī: Justārī dar Falsafih-yi Zabān. translated by Muḥammad ʻAlī   ʻAbd Allāhī. Qum: Pazhūhishgāh-i ʻUlūm va Farhang Islāmī, 1969/1348.

Ṭabl, Ḥasan. Uslūb al-Iltifāt fī al-Balāgha al-Qurānīya. Cairo: Dār al-Islām, 2010/1431.

Ṭiyyb, Muḥammad Taqī. “Taḥlīl-i Kalām Khudā, Baḥthī Pirāmūn Matn Qurān Majīd”. Majmūʿah Maqālāt-i Chāhārumīn Kunfirāns Zabānshināsī Naẓarī va Kārburdī, researched by Sayyid ʻAlī Mīr ʻImādī. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University, 2000/1379: 165-180.

Yule, George. Kārburdshināsī Zabān. researched by Muḥammad ʻAmūzādih va Manūchihr Tavāngar. Tehran: Samt,  1983/1362.

Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd ibn ʻUmar. al-Kashāf ʿan Ḥaqāʾiq Ghawāmiḍ al-Tanzīl wa ʻUyūn al-Aqāwīl fī Wujūh al-Taʾwī. Beirut:  Dār al-Kitāb al-ʻArabī, 1987/1407.